There are exciting years ahead for the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF). This inherited autosomal recessive genetic disorder has proven an incredibly tough nut to crack for drug developers, with research efforts hampered by the formidable scientific challenges involved in getting to grips with the condition, which affects around one in every 3,000 newborns with approximately 75,000-100,000 patients worldwide, most commonly in those of northern European descent.
Nevertheless, progress in the last few decades has had a marked impact on the life expectancy of CF patients. In the 1960s, median survival for those born with CF was around 10 years, with few surviving into their teenage years. Today, average life expectancy can be as high as 50 years, at least in countries that provide access to today’s most advanced treatments.
CF treatments: the waiting game
CF is caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, which codes for the CFTR protein. This protein’s role is to facilitate the movement of chloride ions in and out of cells to balance salt and water on exocrine epithelial surfaces, an important function for organs such as the lungs and pancreas. CF occurs when a baby inherits abnormal copies of the CFTR gene from both parents, which results in a dysfunctional chloride channel and a resulting inhibition of sodium and water across epithelial cells.
The disorder leads to the creation of thicker-than-normal mucus, which causes obstructions in the lungs and airways and provides a haven for bacterial infections. As well as shortness of breath and recurrent infections, CF patients may also be faced with a varied array of other symptoms, from poor growth and weight gain to digestive issues and potential infertility in males.
Until relatively recently, treatment options were limited to the mitigation of individual symptoms, such as inhaled antibiotics to tackle infections in the lungs. The watershed moment for CF research came in 1989 when the CFTR gene responsible for the disorder was identified, opening up the possibility for new gene therapies to address the root cause of CF, rather than just treating the symptoms.
How well do you really know your competitors?
Access the most comprehensive Company Profiles on the market, powered by GlobalData. Save hours of research. Gain competitive edge.
Thank you!
Your download email will arrive shortly
Not ready to buy yet? Download a free sample
We are confident about the unique quality of our Company Profiles. However, we want you to make the most beneficial decision for your business, so we offer a free sample that you can download by submitting the below form
By GlobalDataStill, it has been a long wait for patients in the CF community, as effective CFTR-based treatments are only now beginning to arrive, and there is still much work left to do to improve their efficacy. In an emotive 2015 editorial for Cystic Fibrosis News Today, PhD student and CF patient Stephen Shannon equated the experience of waiting for a CF breakthrough to a Latin phrase, dum spiro spero, which translates to, “while I breathe I hope”.
“This past year has been the first time I have allowed myself to begin to hope that my life can be different than it is now,” Shannon wrote. “Now more than ever, the words ‘Dum spiro spero’ [represent] the strength that is carried in each of us who suffer from this disease. And with each of these therapies that is developed, our breath becomes deeper and our hope stronger.”
Vertex dominant in CFTR
But what are drug developers doing to stoke such high hopes in the CF community? In the last five years or so, a new crop of CFTR-regulating drugs has begun to hit the market. These therapies are designed to correct the function of defective CFTR protein translated from a mutated CFTR gene. The first such drug to arrive on the scene was Kalydeco (ivacaftor), developed by Boston-based Vertex Pharmaceuticals, with a helping hand in the form of $150m in philanthropic investment from the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.
Kalydeco was hailed as a wonder drug upon its approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2012, as it was the first treatment to directly target the gene mutations responsible for cystic fibrosis. The drug works as a CFTR potentiator, improving the transport of chloride through the ion channel by binding directly to the channels and improving the odds that they will stay open. The treatment has shown broad efficacy in CF patients who are suited to the drug, with trials showing significant improvements in lung function, decreases in the frequency of pulmonary exacerbation and greater weight gain when compared to placebo.
In many ways Kalydeco represents a milestone for personalised medicine, and a clear indication of the pharma sector’s direction of travel in terms of tailoring treatments to patients’ genetic profiles. But, as much as drugs like Kalydeco have opened up the possibilities of personalised medicine, the specificity of tailored drugs brings complications for the treatment of a condition that can potentially be caused by thousands of CFTR gene mutations. Kalydeco, for example, is only effective in patients who have one of around 10 mutations (primarily G551D), which represents only 4%-5% of the total CF community.
Combination therapies
As a result, Vertex has been working to develop combination therapies to increase the proportion of the patient population for whom CFTR-based treatment would be effective. Orkambi, a combination of ivacaftor and lumacaftor, was approved by the FDA in July 2015, and is effective in a much higher proportion of the CF community, as more than half of CF patients globally have the two copies of the F508del mutation that is targeted by the treatment.
At the end of March, Vertex announced positive results from two Phase III clinical trials (EVOLVE and EXPAND) of its tezacaftor/ivacaftor combination, which met its primary endpoints in lung function improvement in both studies. In the same month, the company continued to solidify its position as the key player in CFTR potentiators with the acquisition of investigational drug CTP-656 from Concert Pharmaceuticals for up to $250m, adding this deuterated form of ivacaftor to Vertex’s options for future drug combinations.
These breakthrough innovations come at a high cost at a time when drug pricing is very much under the spotlight, particularly in the US. List prices for Kalydeco run to around $300,000 a year – not particularly unusual for a treatment that has been granted orphan and breakthrough drug designations, but still enough to draw strong criticism from many corners of the medical community (a 2013 editorial in the Journal of the American Medical Association described the price as “exorbitant”) and deny or delay access under public healthcare systems in Canada, Europe and elsewhere. The UK’s National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) rejected the use of Orkambi on the NHS, prompting protests from charities and patient groups keen to see negotiations bring the drug into use on the health service.
ProQR’s RNA-based approach
While Vertex is dominant in the CFTR modulation space, with two approved treatments and more in the pipeline, it’s certainly not the only company looking to pursue innovative means of rectifying CFTR processes. In the Netherlands, ProQR Therapeutics is working on an RNA-centric approach to restoring CFTR function by targeting the messenger RNA (mRNA) in CF patients who have the common F508del mutation. This first-in-class RNA-based oligonucleotide (QR-010), which would be administered via a nebuliser and delivered as a mist inhaled directly into the lungs, is designed to bind to defective CFTR mRNA and restore proper function.
The treatment is still in the early stages of development, but in October last year ProQR announced the results of a proof-of-concept study in which QR-010 met its primary endpoint of making a statistically significant improvement to nasal potential difference (NPD, a measurement of CFTR function) in 10 CF patients who were homozygous for the F508del mutation.
“Confirming QR-010's ability to improve CFTR function in homozygous [F508del] patients is a strong validation of the preclinical evidence and reinforces our belief that QR-010 can make a transformative difference in the lives of CF patients,” said ProQR CEO Daniel de Boer in October.
As much as CFTR modulators look to be the next step in CF treatment, drug developers in other areas are seeking to provide incremental improvements and new options for patients to mitigate their symptoms. The market for pancreatic enzyme replacement therapies (PERTs) is a crowded one, with pancreatic enzyme combinations available from the likes of AbbVie (Creon), Johnson & Johnson (Pancreaze) and Digestive Care (Pertzye). These pancreatic enzyme products are used to treat exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) associated with CF.
Other CF advances
Even in a market as saturated as PERTs, there is still room for innovation. Anthera Pharmaceuticals, for example, recently announced results from its Phase III SOLUTION non-inferiority clinical study, which found that the company’s new PERT Sollpura (liprotamase) had efficacy comparable to Johnson & Johnson’s Pancreaze in terms of weight and height maintenance.
The difference is that Sollpura has the potential to become the first approved PERT that is neither porcine-derived nor enterically coated. With the ability to dissolve the medication in liquid or reduce the number of capsules that need to be taken, paediatric patients could have much less trouble taking the drug, improving adherence to treatment. The drug could also provide an alternative for patients who don’t react well to porcine-derived PERTs. Anthera started screening patients for another Phase III trial, RESULT, in May, and expects to produce top-line results by late 2017 or early 2018.
More CF innovations are in the pipeline. Montreal-based Laurent Pharmaceuticals, for example, got the go-ahead from the FDA and Health Canada in April to move forward with its Phase II trial of LAU-7b, an investigational drug that could become the first anti-inflammatory treatment indicated for CF.
The drug is intended to activate the resolution phase of the inflammatory response, potentially addressing chronic inflammation without inducing immune-suppression. Unlike some CFTR-based therapies, which are targeted at specific genetic mutations, introducing a novel anti-inflammatory to CF patients could bring more universal benefits to the treatment population, although any approval is still likely to be years away.
The last few decades have been a long slog for a patient population that is in desperate need of more effective therapies. But with the wave of iterative improvements and innovative new drugs on the market and in the pipeline today, it looks as though CF patients can finally look forward to a dramatically improved treatment landscape on the horizon. CF remains one of the Western world’s most pernicious and stubborn chronic illnesses, but to paraphrase Stephen Shannon, drug developers are in a better position than ever to deepen the breath and strengthen the hope of all those who suffer from it.